I have committed the two documentation changes, with some minor adjustments.
On 07.03.23 18:14, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>>>> Maybe this could be fixed instead?
>>>
>>> Indeed, and strtoul is probably a better option than sscanf, don't
>>> you think ?
>>
>> Yeah, the use of sscanf() is kind of weird here. We have been moving
>> the option parsing to use option_parse_int(). Maybe hex support could
>> be added there. Or just use strtoul().
>
>
> I've made the change with strtoul
>
> About option_parse_int(), actually, strtoint() is used, do we need a
> option_parse_ul() fonction ?
For the option parsing, I propose the attached patch. This follows the
structure of option_parse_int(), so in the future it could be extracted
and refactored in the same way, if there is more need.
