Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id a7a19512-3a8c-7e97-5b16-2547315a8488@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/17/2017 09:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> MERGE isn't UPSERT, and isn't even in competition with UPSERT as a
>> feature. I've written reams of text explaining why this is so in
>> precise detail, ...


Hello,

This is the webinar that started this whole thread (well the original 
thread, not this weird MERGE/UPSERT stuff):

https://www.commandprompt.com/blog/postgresql_for_oracle_people/

Thank you to everyone that responded. You will see in this Webinar that 
at least from the Oracle people perspective, PostgreSQL is not an option 
unless it has packages.

The other item that people bring up a few times is Oracle Forms but as 
that is actually external (although dependent) on Oracle, I don't see 
that as our responsibility.

Sincerely,

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] logical-replication.sgml improvements
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP