On 2017/06/09 20:47, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Thanks for the long explanation. I guess, this should be written in
> comments somewhere in the code there. I see following comment in
> ATExecAttachPartition()
> --
> *
> * There is a case in which we cannot rely on just the result of the
> * proof.
> */
>
> --
>
> I guess, this comment should be expanded to explain what you wrote above.
Tried in the attached updated patch.
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers