On 15.10.24 22:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I don't understand the point of this. Maybe it's okay to try to detect
>> certain "hidden" whitespace characters, like in the case that started this
>> thread. But I don't see the value in prohibiting all non-ASCII characters,
>> as is being proposed here.
> Well, we can only use Latin-1, so the idea is that we will be explicit
> about specifying Latin-1 only as HTML entities, rather than letting
> non-Latin-1 creep in as UTF8.
But your patch prohibits even otherwise allowed Latin-1 characters.
I don't see why we need to enforce this at this level. Whatever
downstream toolchain has requirements about which characters are allowed
will complain if it encounters a character it doesn't like.
