On 3/15/21 11:11 AM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 6:08 AM, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I completely agree that checking uniqueness requires looking at the heap, but I don't agree that every caller of
bt_index_checkon an index wants that particular check to be performed. There are multiple ways in which an index might
becorrupt, and Peter wrote the code to only check some of them by default, with options to expand the checks to other
things. This is why heapallindexed is optional. If you don't want to pay the price of checking all entries in the heap
againstthe btree, you don't have to.
>>
>> I've got the idea and revised the patch accordingly. Thanks!
>> Pfa v4 of a patch. I've added an optional argument to allow uniqueness checks for the unique indexes.
>> Also, I added a test variant to make them work on 32-bit systems. Unfortunately, converting the regression test to
TAPwould be a pain for me. Hope it can be used now as a 2-variant regression test for 32 and 64 bit systems.
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration!
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Pavel Borisov
>>
>> Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
>> <v4-0001-Make-amcheck-checking-UNIQUE-constraint-for-btree.patch>
>
> Looking over v4, here are my review comments...
This patch appears to need some work and has not been updated in several
weeks, so marking Returned with Feedback.
Please submit to the next CF when you have a new patch.
Regards,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
