Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Andreas Rogge
Subject Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Date
Msg-id a3456aeb-8af3-4c0d-b890-6ffa853f5773@bareos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
List pgsql-pkg-yum
Am 12.03.25 um 15:32 schrieb Devrim Gündüz:
> We don't provide versioned *symbols*.
That's correct.

 > It is just provides.
Is it also "just dependencies"? We all know that stuff is there for a 
reason.

 > Why would we match Red Hat packaging?
That's exactly what I'm asking: How did you end up with these provides? 
Why did someone manually add these to the SPEC if it was not to match 
the Red Hat package?

Best Regards,
Andreas
-- 
Andreas Rogge                             andreas.rogge@bareos.com
   Bareos GmbH & Co. KG                      Phone: +49 221-630693-86
   http://www.bareos.com

   Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln | Amtsgericht Köln: HRA 29646
   Komplementär: Bareos Verwaltungs-GmbH
   Geschäftsführer: Stephan Dühr, Jörg Steffens, Philipp Storz




pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql17-debugsource-17.4 for Fedora 41 missing?
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides