Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION
Date
Msg-id a2e22743-3bb6-8e94-10ed-478e3e25e65a@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION  (Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/5/23 08:14, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> As for the test results, I very much doubt the differences are not
>> caused simply by random timing variations, or something like that. And I
>> don't understand what "Performance Machine Linux" is, considering those
>> timings are slower than the other two machines.
> 
> The machine has Total Memory of 755.536 GB, 120 CPUs and RHEL 7 Operating System
> Also find the detailed info of the performance machine attached.
> 

Thanks for the info. I don't think the tests really benefit from this
much resources, I would be rather surprised if it was faster beyond 8
cores or so. The CPU frequency likely matters much more. Which probably
explains why this machine was the slowest.

Also, I wonder how much the results vary between the runs. I suppose you
only did s single run for each, right?

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2