Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted
Date
Msg-id ZrZoG3uZmUOgbHOv@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:01:20PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks.  This one looks pretty good to me, and so I plan to commit it in
> the near future unless anyone voices concerns about the approach.

As I am preparing this for commit, I'm wondering whether it makes sense to
name the new function vacuum_sleep() and keep it private to vacuum.c.
Nothing about this function is terribly specific to vacuum, and it's not
inconceivable that it might be useful elsewhere.  Perhaps we should move it
to pgsleep.c and rename it to something to the effect of
pg_usleep_non_interruptable().

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: is_superuser versus set_config_option's parallelism check
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: is_superuser versus set_config_option's parallelism check