On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:21:23PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:48:37PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Cool. I'll at least fix the back-branches as-is, but I'll see about
>> revamping this stuff for v18.
>
> Attached is probably the absolute least we should do for the back-branches.
Any concerns with doing something like this [0] for the back-branches? The
constant would be 6 instead of 7 on v14 through v16.
I wrote a quick sketch for what a runtime-computed GUC might look like for
v18. We don't have agreement on this approach, but I figured I'd post
something while we search for a better one.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/160360/v1-0001-fix-kernel-resources-docs-on-back-branches.patch
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
