Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Imseih (AWS), Sami
Subject Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Date
Msg-id F4131F24-A20F-4A04-B1A6-60242A7C7A43@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
List pgsql-hackers
> Any concerns with doing something like this [0] for the back-branches? The
> constant would be 6 instead of 7 on v14 through v16.

As far as backpatching the present inconsistencies in the docs,
[0] looks good to me.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/160360/v1-0001-fix-kernel-resources-docs-on-back-branches.patch
<https://postgr.es/m/attachment/160360/v1-0001-fix-kernel-resources-docs-on-back-branches.patch>


Regards,

Sami



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Re: zlib detection in Meson on Windows broken?
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal