On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:03:45AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2024-04-18 Th 02:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Why usingFile::Temp::tempfile here? Couldn't you just use a
>> file in a PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::tempdir() that would be cleaned up
>> once the test finishes?
>
> That's another possibility, but I think the above is the simplest.
Are you sure that relying on Temp::File is a good thing overall? The
current temporary file knowledge is encapsulated within Utils.pm, with
files removed or kept depending on PG_TEST_NOCLEAN. So it would be
just more consistent to rely on the existing facilities instead?
test_json_parser is the only code path in the whole tree that directly
uses File::Temp. The rest of the TAP tests relies on Utils.pm for
temp file paths.
--
Michael
