Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Date
Msg-id Zhc2Y-hbuGIE5DQ8@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:49AM +0300, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> As far as I understand CF entry [0] is committed? I understand that
> there are some open followups, but I just want to determine correct
> CF item status...

So much work has happened on this thread with things that has been
committed, so switching the entry to committed makes sense to me.  I
have just done that.

Bharath, could you create a new thread with the new things you are
proposing?  All that should be v18 work, particularly v27-0002:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACWCibnX2jcnRreBHFesFeQ6vbKiFstML=w-JVTvUKD_EA@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: CI and test improvements