Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Date
Msg-id B7DA0FBD-DFAF-411E-8E9C-ADB63A11AF1C@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

> On 8 Apr 2024, at 08:17, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Bharath!

As far as I understand CF entry [0] is committed? I understand that there are some open followups, but I just want to
determinecorrect CF item status... 

Thanks!


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4060/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: SET ROLE documentation improvement
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?