Re: doc issues in event-trigger-matrix.html - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: doc issues in event-trigger-matrix.html
Date
Msg-id Zfjm4nDEHMHlH8J6@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to doc issues in event-trigger-matrix.html  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: doc issues in event-trigger-matrix.html
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0800, jian he wrote:
> I think the "X" and "-" mean in this matrix [0] is not very intuitive.
> mainly because "X" tends to mean negative things in most cases.
> we can write a sentence saying "X"  means this, "-" means that.
>
> or maybe Check mark [1] and Cross mark [2]  are more universal.
> and we can use these marks.
>
> "Only for local objects"
> is there any reference explaining "local objects"?
> I think local object means objects that only affect one single database?

It is true that in Japan the cross mark refers to a negation, and
that's the opposite in France: I would put a cross on a table in the
case where something is supported.  I've never seen anybody complain
about the format of these tables, FWIW, but if these were to be
changed, the update should happen across the board for all the tables
and not only one.

Using ASCII characters also has the advantage to make the maintenance
clightly easier, in my opinion, because there is no translation effort
between these special characters and their XML equivalent, like "<"
<-> "<".
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support json_errdetail in FRONTEND builds
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two