Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two
Date
Msg-id ZfJHfTU0yijCesSo@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 07:00:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I don't understand what the overall benefit of this change is supposed to
> be.

In the context of this thread, this removes the dependency of sequence
value lookup to heap.

> If this route were to be pursued, it should be a different function name.
> We shouldn't change the signature of an existing function.

I'm not so sure about that.  The existing pg_sequence_last_value is
undocumented and only used in a system view.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Have pg_basebackup write "dbname" in "primary_conninfo"?
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum