On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:10:49PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> So that we could do something like
>
> ok(node_standby->await_injection_point(“CreateRestartPoint”,”checkpointer"));
It would be more flexible with a full string to describe the test
rather than a process name in the second argument.
> IMO, this could make many tests cleaner.
> Or, perhaps, it’s a functionality for a future development?
This could just happen as separate refactoring, I guess. But I'd wait
to see if more tests requiring scans to pg_stat_activity pop up. For
example, the test just posted here does not rely on that:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZdyZya4YrNapWKqz@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
--
Michael
