Re: sync_standbys_defined read/write race on startup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Maksim.Melnikov wrote:
> On 10.04.2025 12:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hmm, yeah.  Instead of last, it would be better to put it in second
>> place perhaps, for clarity?  That would be the same at the end, but we
>> would be slightly more consistent with the past logic regarding the
>> ordering.  Does that look OK to you?
>
> Yes, from my point of view it looks fine.

Thanks for the double-check.  I've played a couple more hours with the
startup case, like playing with s_s_names set but uninitialized in
shmem while stucking backends, and that seems OK, so applied down to
v13.  Let's see how it goes..
--
Michael