Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id Z_VLaJenqQ1vYsFc@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr  8, 2025 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
> Jacob Champion:
> > The above is discussing a patch to split this into its own loadable
> > module.
> 
> Wasn't sure where to put this exactly, the thread is long and I couldn't
> find any discussion around it:
> 
> How does the proposal with a loadable module affect a static libpq.a?
> 
> I have not tried, yet, but is my assumption correct, that I could build a
> libpq.a with oauth/curl support on current HEAD?
> 
> If yes, would that still be an option after the split?

How does this patch help us avoid having to handle curl CVEs and its
curl's additional dependencies?  As I understand the patch, it makes
libpq _not_ have additional dependencies but moves the dependencies to a
special loadable library that libpq can use.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER