On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 05:29:00PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> Your back-patches are correct. Thanks.
Thanks for double-checking. I'll move on with what I have after a
second look as it's been a few weeks since I've looked at all these
conflicts. I am also planning to add a few notes in the commits to
mention this thread.
> Here it is. Making it fail three times took looping 1383s, 5841s, and 2594s.
> Hence, it couldn't be expected to catch the regression before commit, but it
> would have made sufficient buildfarm and CI noise in the day after commit.
Hmm. Not much of a fan of the addition of a test that has less than
1% of reproducibility for the problem, even if it's good to see that
this can be made portable to run down to v13.
--
Michael
