Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date
Msg-id ZWh157rNk2AJ5FXn@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Thomas Munro
> I randomly remembered this topic after seeing an s390x announcement
> from Christoph[1], and figured he or someone else might be interested
> in the same observation about that platform.  That is, we finally got
> around to defining this for ARM, but I bet one internet point that
> RISCV64 and s390x have that property too (but would need to find a
> written reference, or perhaps a similar declaration in the Linux
> sources, etc):

Fwiw, while s390x is admittedly more of historical interest, riscv64
is well on the way of becoming an official release architecture with
the next Debian stable release, so having it supported properly by
PostgreSQL would be appreciated.

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] global sequence implemented by snowflake ID