On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:58:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
>> PostgreSQL's unaccent module does not use Unicode normalisation, but only a
>> simple search-and-replace dictionary. The dictionary, unaccent.rules
>> (https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/contrib/unaccent/unaccent.rules)
>> , does not contain these Japanese characters, thus its unable to remove
>> the diacritic signs. Can someone please guide when we can expect these
>> Japanese characters will be added.
>
> unaccent.rules, as distributed, is just an example. It is not meant
> to be exhaustive or authoritative.
FWIW, I'm quite fluent in Japanese and was discussing a bit this
around me and, like me, folks were kind of troubled with the concept
that these should be considered as "accents", because it would
entirely change the meaning of what each Hiragana and Katakana means.
I am not sure if it would make sense to apply such an operation on an
expression index or similar, either. As a whole, adding that to the
in-core unaccent.rules would be a bad idea if we were to consider it.
> Feel free to add your own entries to your copy.
Indeed. The way to write a .rules should be clearly documented.
--
Michael
