On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:18:59AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> * Implement as a variant of sequence access method. I found that sequence AM was
> proposed many years ago [5], but it has not been active now. It might be a
> fundamental way but needs a huge works.
Well, that's what I can call a timely proposal. I've been working
this week on a design for sequence AMs, while considering the cases
that the original thread wanted to handle (spoiler: there are a lot of
pieces in the original patch that are not necessary, other parts are
incorrect like dump/restore), what you are trying to do here, and more
complex scenarios in terms of globally-distributed sequences. My plan
was to send that next week or the week after, in time for January's
CF.
--
Michael
