Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss
Date
Msg-id ZTdOalhqXp7GS36a@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:20:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If there's no interest in this patch set after the next CF, I'm OK to
> drop it.  The state of HEAD is at least correct in the OOM cases now.

I have been thinking about this patch for the last few days, and in
light of 6b18b3fe2c2f I am going to withdraw it for now as this makes
the error layers of the xlogreader more complicated.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Next
From: Kirk Wolak
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN)