Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Date
Msg-id ZRNIIf2MiEcXeAee@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Sep  7, 2023 at 10:44:25AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Sep 2023, at 21:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
> >> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.
> > 
> > How is this attached patch?
> 
> Reads good to me, +1.

Patch applied to master.  I didn't think backpatching it made much sense
since it is so localized.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Add const qualifiers
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?