Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Date
Msg-id C7D6C832-23B2-4550-8D6B-7D09B525141A@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
List pgsql-hackers
> On 6 Sep 2023, at 21:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

>> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
>> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.
> 
> How is this attached patch?

Reads good to me, +1.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: psql - pager support - using invisible chars for signalling end of report