>On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:01:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > Just a thought.
>> >
>> > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names.
>>
>> Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid.
>>
>> This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m not
>> sure this would look more odd than what is there now.
>If you look at the current doc version:
>
> https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-14.html
>
>Notice that for these two items:
>
> Remove factorial operators ! and !! (Mark Dilger)
> The factorial() function is still supported. Also remove function numeric_fac().
>
> Disallow factorial() of negative numbers (Peter Eisentraut)
> Previously such cases returned 1.
>
>Only the first mention of "factorial()" uses a link; the second item
>doesn't have any link.
There are other places as well, like this on:
"The postgres_fdw supports these type of scans if async_capable is set."
async_capable is not a link. Or this one:
"This speeds normalize() and IS NORMALIZED."
I still think it should be more consistent and all should be links, even if they point to the same section.
Regards
Daniel
