Re: Add support for AT LOCAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date
Msg-id ZR-jmKYU5BDQEAe4@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add support for AT LOCAL  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Responses Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Okay.  Here is a v3 using that approach.

You have not posted any numbers to show if there's a difference in
performance, so I have run a simple test:
PREPARE test AS SELECT TIMESTAMP '1978-07-07 19:38' AT LOCAL;
DO $$ BEGIN
  FOR i IN 1..1000000 LOOP
    EXECUTE 'EXECUTE test';
  END LOOP;
END $$;

On a medium-ish benchmark machine I have (16 vCPUs, 32GB of memory,
-O2, no asserts), this DO block takes in average 4.3s to run with v2,
versus 3.6s with v3.  So yes, that's faster.

I haven't yet finished my review of the patch, still looking at it.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Use FD_CLOEXEC on ListenSockets (was Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag