Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date
Msg-id ZQvdq7KdQmjnixt-@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 04:54:36PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Is the check to ensure remote_lsn is valid correct in function
> check_for_subscription_state()? How about the case where the apply
> worker didn't receive any change but just marked the relation as
> 'ready'?

I may be missing, of course, but a relation is switched to
SUBREL_STATE_READY only once a sync happened and its state was
SUBREL_STATE_SYNCDONE, implying that SubscriptionRelState->lsn is
never InvalidXLogRecPtr, no?

For instance, nothing happens when a
Assert(!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(rstate->lsn)) is added in
process_syncing_tables_for_apply().
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug fix in vacuumdb --buffer-usage-limit xxx -Z
Next
From: "Lepikhov Andrei"
Date:
Subject: Re: Comment about set_join_pathlist_hook()