Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Date
Msg-id ZPbAUmywqWB+8wGY@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:14:58PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>     # Build the descriptions.  There are in camel-case.
>     # LWLock and Lock classes do not need any modifications.
>
> Nit: 2 whitespaces before "There are in camel"

The whitespaces are intentional, the typo in the first line is not.

> +       my $waiteventdescription = '';
> +       if (   $waitclassname eq 'WaitEventLWLock'
>
> Nit: Too many whitespace after the "if (" ?? (I guess pgperltidy would
> fix it).

Here, perltidy is indeed complaining, but it is adding a few
whitespaces.

> Then, the only diff is:
>
> < Client,WalSenderWaitWal,Waiting for WAL to be flushed in WAL sender process
> ---
> > Client,WalSenderWaitForWAL,Waiting for WAL to be flushed in WAL sender process
>
> That said, it looks good to me.

Ah, good catch.  I did not think about cross-checking the data in the
new view before and after the patch set.  This rename needs to happen
in 0001.

Please find v5 attached.  How does that look?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Impact of checkpointer during pg_upgrade
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node