On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 02:26:56PM +0800, suyu.cmj wrote:
> Yes, the method you proposed is simpler and more
> efficient. Following your idea, I have modified the corresponding
> patch, hope you can review it when you have time.
I'll double-check that tomorrow, but yes, that's basically what I had
in mind. Thanks for the patch!
+ char path[MAXPGPATH];
+ struct stat stat_buf;
These two variables can be declared in the code block added by the
patch where start_lsn is valid.
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errmsg("found unexpected duplicate two-phase
transaction:%u in pg_twophase, check for data correctness.",
+ hdr->xid)));
The last part of this sentence has no need to be IMO, because it is
misleading when building without assertions. How about a single
FATAL/WARNING like that:
- errmsg: "could not recover two-phase state file for transaction %u"
- errdetail: "Two-phase state file has been found in WAL record %X/%X
but this transaction has already been restored from disk."
Then a WARNING simply means that we've skipped the record entirely.
--
Michael
