On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:21:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Cool. I have applied the new tests for now to move on with this
> thread.
I have done a few more things on this patch today, including
measurements with a local host and large scaling numbers. One of my
hosts was taking for instance around 36.8s with scale=500 using the
INSERTs and 36.5s with the COPY when loading data (average of 4
runs) with -I dtg.
Greg's upthread point is true as well that for high latency the
server-side generation is the most adapted option, but I don't see a
reason to not switch to a COPY as this option is hidden behind -I,
just for the sake of improving the default option set. So, at the
end, applied.
--
Michael
