On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:03:48AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I haven't looked at the patch, but assuming it's not calling
> finish_heap_swap(), it might be okay. But it does seem prudent to check
> that the dependency records are handled correctly.
Double-checking, the patch is able to handle that with an extra
changeDependencyFor() in a code path for relkinds that have no
storage. What the patch does not do it look at pg_depend to see if
the dependency records are stored correctly, and that's something it
had better do.
--
Michael
