Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date
Msg-id ZHcxG40D8seP12dd@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 09:26:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Simpler and consistent, nice.  I don't have much more to add, so I
> have switched the patch as RfC.

While at PGcon, Andres has asked me how many sockets are in the
environment I used for the tests, and lscpu tells me the following,
which is more than 1:
CPU(s):                          64
On-line CPU(s) list:             0-63
Core(s) per socket:              16
Socket(s):                       2
NUMA node(s):                    2

@Andres: Were there any extra tests you wanted to be run for more
input?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16