Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster?
Date
Msg-id ZHaw6lcrqJzmsLqq@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:18:25PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:05:10PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > > "Relation extensions have been improved allowing faster bulk loading
> > > of data using COPY. These improvements are more significant when
> > > multiple processes are concurrently loading data into the same table."
> >
> > The release notes don't normally get into details on the magnitude of
> > the improvement in various circumstances.
> 
> Sorry, I meant the release announcement rather than the release notes here.

Oh, yeah, that gets into more details, sure.

There is also the major features list at the top of the release notes
--- that needs adjustment based on release text I have updated recently,
but I don't feel I control that list.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster?
Next
From: Lian Jiang
Date:
Subject: speed up full table scan using psql