On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:28:20PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I mean, I agree that it would probably be hard to measure any real
> performance difference. But I'm not sure that's a good reason to add
> cycles to a path where we don't really need to.
Honestly, I am not sure that it's worth worrying about performance
here, or perhaps you know of some external stuff that could set the
extension class type in a code path hot enough that it would matter.
Anyway, why couldn't we make all these functions static inline
instead, then?
--
Michael
