On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:30:06AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> I have spent a couple of hours looking at the whole again today,
>> testing that with OpenSSL to make sure that everything was OK. Apart
>> from a few tweaks, that seemed pretty good. So, applied.
>
> Thank you!
Please note that the CF entry has been marked as committed. We should
really do something about having a cleaner separation between SASL,
the mechanisms and the AUTH_REQ_* codes, in the long term, though
honestly I don't know yet what would be the most elegant and the least
error-prone approach. And for anything that touches authentication,
simpler means better.
--
Michael
