On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:51:09AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with matching how SSL is handled here and in a review of the
> patch proposed didn't see any issues with it. Seems like it's probably
> something that should also be back-patched and it doesn't look terribly
> risky to do so, is there a specific risk that you see?
Nothing specific per se, just my usual
be-careful-with-slight-behavior-changes-with-libpq-parameters.
Perhaps you are right and there is no actual reason to worry here.
--
Michael
