On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:57:35PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Nov-27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> There would be no default. Running with no option given would raise an
> error. The point is: you want to break scripts currently running
> --analyze-in-stages so that they can make a choice of which of these two
> modes to run. Your proposal (as I understand it) is to remove the
> --analyze-in-stages option and add two other options. My proposal is to
> keep --analyze-in-stages, but require it to have a specifier of which
> mode to run. Both achieve what you want, but I think mine achieves it
> in a cleaner way.
>
> > Uh, do we have parameters that require a boolean option like this?
>
> I'm not sure what exactly are you asking here.
I can't think of a Postgres option that can take only one of two
possible values, and where there is no default value.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
