On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:11:54PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:20 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If this is still unacceptable, I propose to change the comment. (I
>> found that the previous patch forgets about do_pg_backup_stop())
>>
>> - * It fills in backup_state with the information required for the backup,
>> + * It fills in the parameter "state" with the information required for the backup,
>
> +1. There's another place that uses backup_state in the comments. I
> modified that as well. Please see the attached patch.
Thanks, fixed the comments. I have let the variable names as they are
now in the code, as both are backup-related code paths so it is IMO
clear that the state is linked to a backup.
--
Michael
