On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:25:51AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 09:36:13AM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>> Good catch, I think this is a logical followup to the previous
>> has_privs_of_role patch.
>>
>> Reviewed and +1
>
> Thanks! I created a commitfest entry for this:
This patch looks simple, but it is a very sensitive area so I think
that we should be really careful. pg_hba.conf does not have a lot of
test coverage, so I'd really prefer if we add something to see the
difference of behavior and check the behavior that we are switching
here. What I have just committed in 051b096 would help a bit here,
actually, and changing pg_hba.conf rules with rule reload is cheap.
Joe, you are registered as a reviewer and committer of this patch, by
the way. Are you planning to look at it?
--
Michael
