On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:31:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I am not against backpatching this but OTOH it doesn't appear critical
> enough to block one's work, so not backpatching should be fine.
We are just talking about the reset timestamp not being set at
when the object is created, right? This does not strike me as
critical, so applying it only on HEAD is fine IMO. A few months ago,
while in beta, I would have been fine with something applied to
REL_15_STABLE. Now that we are in RC, that's not worth taking a risk
in my opinion.
Amit or Andres, are you planning to double-check and perhaps merge
this patch to take care of the inconsistency?
--
Michael
