On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:04:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > From my POV the only real discussion is whether we'd want to revert this in 15
> > and HEAD or just 15. There's imo a decent point to be made to just revert in
> > 15 and aggressively press forward with the changes posted in this thread.
>
> I'm not for that. Code that we don't think is ready to ship
> has no business being in the common tree, nor does it make
> review any easier to be looking at one bulky set of
> already-committed patches and another bulky set of deltas.
Agreed on removing from PG 15 and master --- it would be confusing to
have lots of incomplete code in master that is not in PG 15.
> I'm okay with making an exception for the include/nodes/ and
> backend/nodes/ files in HEAD, since the recent changes in that
> area mean it'd be a lot of error-prone work to produce a reverting
> patch there. We can leave those in as dead code temporarily, I think.
I don't have an opinion on this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
