Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
Date
Msg-id YprFGkUqdwzfzvRQ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 10:04:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree with Robert's complaint that Parallel is far too generic
> a term here.  Also, the fact that this data is currently in struct
> Port seems like an artifact.
>
> Don't we have a term for the set of processes comprising a leader
> plus parallel workers?  If we called that set FooGroup, then
> something like FooGroupSharedInfo would be on-point.

As far as I know, proc.h includes the term "group members", which
includes the leader and its workers (see CLOG and lock part)?
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch