On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:12:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Btw, shouldn't we have something a bit more, err, extensible for the
>> design of an extensible varlena header? If we keep it down to some
>> bitwise information, we'd be fine for a long time but it would be
>> annoying to review again an extended design if we need to extend it
>> with more data.
>
> What do you have in mind?
A per-varlena checksum was one thing that came into my mind.
--
Michael
