Re: Windows now has fdatasync() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Windows now has fdatasync()
Date
Msg-id Yk+7djaF/4f3gXrJ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows now has fdatasync()  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Windows now has fdatasync()
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:56:15PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I propose that we drop support for Windows versions older than
> 10/Server 2016 in the PostgreSQL 16 cycle, because the OS patches for
> everything older come to an end in October next year[1], and we have a
> lot of patches relating to modern Windows features that stall on
> details about old systems that no one actually has.
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions

Do you think that we could raise the minimum C standard on WIN32 to
C11, at least for MSVC?  There is a patch floating around to add
pg_attribute_aligned() and perhaps pg_attribute_noreturn() for MSVC:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Yk6UgCGlZKuxRr4n@paquier.xyz

noreturn() needed at least C11:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-language/noreturn?view=msvc-140

Perhaps we'd better also bump up the minimum version of MSVC
supported..
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Kerberos delegation support in libpq and postgres_fdw
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70