Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Date
Msg-id YiaxTmfShLTm7gxP@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:06:50AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:39:06 +1300, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote in
>> Thanks, you're right.  Test on a Win10 VM.  Here's a new version.

Looks fine to me.

> FYI, on Windows11, pg_basebackup didn't work correctly without the
> patch.  So this looks like fixing an undiscovered bug as well.

Well, that's not really a long-time bug but just a side effect of
in-place tablespaces because we don't use them in many test cases
yet, is it?

>> pg_basebackup -D copy
> WARNING:  could not read symbolic link "pg_tblspc/16384": Invalid argument
> pg_basebackup: error: tar member has empty name
>
>                1 File(s) 0 bytes
>                3 Dir(s)  171,920,613,376 bytes free

That's a lot of free space.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Logical replication timeout problem
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: refreshing query id for pg_stat_statements based on comment in sql