On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 01:09:53PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> This one has been quiet for a while. Should we mark it as
> returned-with-feedback?
Yes, that's my feeling and I got cold feet about this change. This
patch would bring some extra visibility for something that's not
incorrect either on HEAD, as end-of-recovery checkpoints are the same
things as shutdown checkpoints. And there is an extra argument where
back-patching would become a bit more tricky in an area that's already
a lot sensitive.
--
Michael
