On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:18:58PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:50 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:35:50PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > How about something like LOG_AS_CLONE? That makes it clear, I hope,
> > > that we're logging it a different way, but that method of logging it
> > > is different in each case. You'd still have to read the documentation
> > > to find out what it really means, but at least it seems like it points
> > > you more in the right direction. To me, anyway.
> >
> > I think CLONE would be confusing since we don't use that term often,
> > maybe LOG_DB_COPY or LOG_FILE_COPY?
>
> Yeah, maybe. But it's not clear to me with that kind of naming whether
> TRUE or FALSE would be the existing behavior? One version logs a
> single record for the whole database, and the other logs a record per
> database block. Neither version logs per file. LOG_COPIED_BLOCKS,
> maybe?
Yes, I like BLOCKS more than FILE.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
