On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:18:15AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hmm. I have been looking at this patch, and the lack of centralized
>> solution that could be used for other GUCs worries me like Fujii-san,
>> even if this would prevent an incorrect use of MaxBackends in contexts
>> where it should not be used because it is not initialized yet. I
>> don't think it is a good idea in the long-term to apply this as-is.
>
> Alright. I think the comment adjustments still apply, so I split those out
> to a new patch.
No objections to this part from here, though I have not checked if
there are other areas that may require such an adjustment.
--
Michael
