On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:09:07PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I suppose you're right - I had previously renamed it from no-tableam.
Thanks for the new version. I have noticed that support for the
option with pg_dumpall was missing, but that looks useful to me like
the other switches.
> Because it looks like this is intended to be mostly alphabetical, but that
> wasn't preserved by 63db0ac3f. It's most apparent in "my %full_runs".
Sure. Now I am not sure that this is worth poking at if we don't
change the back-branches, as this could cause conflicts. So I have
left this change out at the end.
And, done.
--
Michael
